Section 1B

Review

Learning Objectives

Choose among squeeze, trigonometric, leading-term, and conjugate methods.

Justify each limit using conditions that actually hold.

Explain when a proposed method gives insufficient information.

Prerequisites: both introductory AP Calculus sections. Trigonometric inputs are in radians. This review uses algebra and established limit facts, without derivative-based methods.

1. Match the Expression to the Method

Feature

Likely method

Bounded oscillation times a shrinking factor

Squeeze using an absolute-value bound

sin(kx) divided by x near zero

Match the angle with its denominator

1 − cos(kx) near zero

Conjugate or known cosine limit

Rational expression at infinity

Compare leading terms

Difference of radical expressions

Multiply by a conjugate

A method is useful only when its hypotheses hold. The product law needs individual finite limits; the Squeeze Theorem needs matching outer limits; the fundamental sine limit needs radian inputs. State the relevant condition before calculating.

2. Combine Two Familiar Patterns

Worked Example: Trigonometry and Algebra

Evaluate lim(x → 0) [sin(2x)/x] × [(√(1 + x) − 1)/x].

The first factor is 2[sin(2x)/(2x)], so it approaches 2.

Rationalizing the second factor gives 1/[√(1 + x) + 1], which approaches 1/2.

Both finite limits exist, so the product law applies and the result is 2 × 1/2 = 1. Each original denominator is nonzero near, but not at, the target.

3. Identify an Invalid Argument

A learner writes lim(x → 0) x sin(1/x) = 0 × lim(x → 0) sin(1/x) = 0. The conclusion happens to be correct, but the displayed product-law argument is invalid because sin(1/x) has no limit at zero. A valid justification is |x sin(1/x)| ≤ |x|, followed by the Squeeze Theorem.

Common Mistakes

A correct numerical answer does not repair an invalid limit-law step.

At negative infinity, replacing |x|/x by 1 gives the wrong sign.

Bounds with different limits provide no squeeze conclusion, even if the middle function independently has a limit.

4. Mixed Practice

1. Find lim(x → 0) x² cos(7/x). State the bounds.

2. Find lim(x → 0) sin(6x)/sin(2x).

3. Find lim(x → 0) (1 − cos(4x))/x².

4. Find lim(x → −∞) (7x² − 3)/(2x² + x).

5. Find lim(x → −∞) √(16x² + 1)/x.

6. Find lim(x → +∞) [√(x² + 8x + 3) − x].

7. Suppose −|x| ≤ f(x) − 3 ≤ x² near zero. Find the limit of f(x) at zero.

Worked Solutions

1. The bounds are −x² and x², both approaching zero. The limit is 0.

2. Write the expression as 3[sin(6x)/(6x)][2x/sin(2x)]. Both bracketed factors approach 1, giving 3.

3. Rewrite as 16[1 − cos(4x)]/(4x)². The result is 16(1/2) = 8.

4. Equal polynomial degrees give 7/2. Dividing every term by x² verifies the result.

5. Write the quotient as (|x|/x)√(16 + 1/x²). At negative infinity this tends to −4.

6. Rationalization gives (8x + 3)/[√(x² + 8x + 3) + x]. Divide by positive x to obtain (8 + 3/x)/[√(1 + 8/x + 3/x²) + 1]. The limit is 8/2 = 4.

7. Both bounds for f(x) − 3 approach zero. Hence f(x) − 3 approaches zero and f(x) approaches 3.

5. Summary

  • Look for structure before choosing a limit technique.
  • Use bounds for oscillation, identities for trigonometry, and leading terms for rational end behavior.
  • Track signs and scale factors explicitly.
  • Justify the method as well as the final number.

Need personalised help?

Our expert tutors can walk you through any topic in a 1-on-1 session.

Book a Free Trial Session